Pendleton v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that plaintiffs status as a trespasser on the train couplings held irrelevant where the allegations and evidence were not that the injury was caused by a condition of the train but solely by its negligent operation
• explaining that plaintiff's status as a trespasser on train couplings was \irrelevant where the evidence and allegations are not that the injury was caused by a condition of the train but solely by the negligent operation of it\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).