Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Defendant’s suggestion that few Plaintiffs would re-file is the precise reason Congress authorized class action treatment for these types of cases.”
• noting that “Defendant’s suggestion that few Plaintiffs would re-file is the precise reason Congress authorized class action treatment for these types of cases.”
• stating that “merely classifying a group of employees as exempt does not automatically qualify them as similarly situated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).