Pendergrass v. Hodge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring the plaintiff to descend stairs in shackles did not constitute a “‘sufficiently serious’ deprivation of a basic human need in violation of contemporary notions of decency”
• requiring the plaintiff to descend stairs in shackles did not constitute a “ ‘sufficiently serious’ deprivation of a basic human need in violation of contemporary notions of decency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).