Connecticut Appellate Court· 5/30/2000
Pender v. Matranga
Citations
- 58 Conn. App. 19
- 752 A.2d 77
- 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[a]n easement of necessity may occur when a parcel has become landlocked from outside access such that the owner would have no reasonable means of ingress or egress except over lands promised by another and a right-of-way is necessary for the enjoyment of the parcel”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-09· cited 36×
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-18· cited 19×
- Simone v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-30· cited 12×
- Leposky v. FentonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-04-24· cited 8×
- Christensen v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-02-05· cited 7×
- Utay v. G.C.S. Realty, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-01· cited 6×
- Thomas v. PrimusConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-02-04· cited 1×
- Kusznir v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-10-17
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-06-02· cited 356×
- HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-04-06· cited 72×
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-05-04· cited 68×
- Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-03-07· cited 64×
- Powers v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-01-11· cited 46×
- Birdsey v. KosienskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-11-10· cited 44×
- Lichteig v. ChurinetzConnecticut Appellate Court· 1986-12-30· cited 39×
- State v. LindstromConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-23· cited 21×
- Schultz v. BarkerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-30· cited 18×
- State v. MarkeveysConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-02-22· cited 14×
- Friedman v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-01· cited 13×
- O'Brien v. CoburnConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-09-09· cited 12×
- Parham v. ReddickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-29· cited 11×
- Lockwood v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1887-12-01· cited 11×
- Strollo v. IannantuoniConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-06-08· cited 7×
- Food Studio, Inc. v. Fabiola'sConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-03-14· cited 7×
- Rosales v. LupienConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-09-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.