Skip to main content
· 6/12/2002

Penabad v. GLADSTONE ASSOCIATES, INC.

Citations

  • 823 So. 2d 146
  • 2002 WL 1285340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Furthermore, Novel Penabad was not a party to the underlying motion to dissolve a lis pendens and, therefore, also has no standing here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levy, Gersten, and Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.