Pena-Crespo v. Commonwealth of PR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting submitting the expert witness’ name is not enough and that each witness must provide a written report containing the information required under Rule 26
• “‘exclusion of evidence is a standard sanction for a violation of the duty of disclosure under Rule 26(a)”’
• “there is no presumption of irreparable harm in procedural violations 14 of environmental statutes”
• when an expert report fails to satisfy the specifics of the rule or when an expert opinion introduced at trial has not been included in the expert’s pre-trial report, the Court may exclude the evidence.
• stating all five elements of a First Amendment retaliation claim
• noting the law of case doctrine is discretionary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).