Pena-Alum Glass & Mirror v. Nationwide Terminals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• possibility that witness’ insurance rates may increase if judgment rendered against defendant, who was insured by same carrier, highly speculative, and, thus, any possible relevance of such evidence was far outweighed by prejudicial impact
• preeluding evidence of commonality of insurance
• precluding evidence of commonality of insurance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).