Peluso v. Kistner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that equitable estoppel is not an independent cause of action
• reasoning that the elements of promissory estoppel must be “strictly enforced” to guard against “loose application.”
• “To establish promissory estoppel, the plaintiff must prove that: (1) the promisor made a promise that would reasonably be expected to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee; (2
• requiring “substantial” change in position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).