Skip to main content
· 10/2/2003

Peltz v. United Health Care (In Re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.)

Citations

  • 299 B.R. 567
  • 2003 Bankr. LEXIS 1300
  • 41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 270
  • 2003 WL 22297927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Premium payments found not to be new value because statutory grace period does not extend the time in debtor becomes obligated to pay premiums (the date incurred) and, therefore, late payments were antecedent debt.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David P. McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.