Pellicer v. St. Barnabas Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[o]rdinarily we rely on trial courts and their firsthand ‘feel of the case’ as it bears on an analysis of whether the jury’s verdict was motivated by improper influences. Baxter [ v. Fairmont Food Co.], 74 N.J. [588, ]600[, 379 A.2d 225 (1977
• remanding to different judge \to avoid the appearance of bias or prejudice based upon the judge's prior involvement\ and credibility determinations
• remanding to different judge \to avoid the appearance of bias or prejudice based upon the judge's prior involvement\
• explaining trial courts have discretion in conducting jury voir dire and determining the qualifications of prospective jurors
• remanding to different judge \to avoid the appearance of bias or prejudice based upon the judge's prior involvement\ and credibility determinations
• remanding to different judge \to avoid the appearance of bias or prejudice based upon the judge's prior involvement . . . A-1450-20 9 and his expressions of frustration\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).