Skip to main content
· 3/10/2004

Pelliccia v. Arce

Citations

  • 867 So. 2d 619
  • 2004 WL 433823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing order modifying custody because proceedings were commenced upon a motion for contempt and there was no finding that modification was in the best interest of the child
  • “[D]ue process concerns were implicated when a party was not properly put on notice that a change of custody was being sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casanueva

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.