Skip to main content

Pelletier v. Pelletier

Citations

  • 597 A.2d 60
  • 1991 Me. LEXIS 292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for continuance where the moving party “had sufficient notice” of the hearing
  • concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion to continue based on a party’s lack of preparation when that party had sufficient notice of the hearing, had a full opportunity to present his case, and failed to demonstrate any prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKusick, Roberts, Wathen, Glassman, Clifford, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.