Pell v. Weinstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that breach of contract claim against corporate officer was subject to dismissal because there were no allegations of piercing the corporate veil
• “Significantly, plaintiffs do not allege that the officer and director defendants committed acts of racketeering activity in their individual capacities. Instead they allege that the [defendants] acted as officers of [the enterprise].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).