Pelican Building Centers of Horry-Georgetown, Inc. v. Dutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “although the appellant learned for the first time upon receiving the order on a post-trial motion that the respondent would be granted certain additional relief, the appellant must move under Rule 59(e
• holding motions for new trial on grounds of either excessiveness or inadequacy are addressed to sound discretion of the trial court
• holding when trial court’s oral and written orders are inconsistent, appellant must bring these inconsistencies to the trial court’s attention through a motion to alter or amend to preserve the issue for appeal
• stating that although the appellant learned for the first time upon receiving the order on a post-trial motion that the respondent would be granted certain additional relief, the appellant must move under Rule 59(e
• explaining that a post-trial motion to alter or amend is the proper avenue to preserve an issue for appeal when the issue appears for the first time in the trial court's final order
• stating that although the appellant learned for the first time upon receiving the order on a post-trial motion that the respondent would be granted certain additional relief, the appellant must move under Rule 59(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).