Pelache v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that providing notice of intent to enhance an offense is sufficient to provide notice to enhance any lesser-included offenses of that offense
• holding that notice of intent to enhance indicted offense was sufficient notice of intent to enhance lesser-included offense
• holding that “due process does not require pretrial notice ‘that the trial on the substantive offense will be followed by an habitual criminal proceeding’”
• holding that notice of intent to enhance indicted offense was sufficient notice of intent to enhance lesser-included offense
• holding that ―due process does not require pretrial notice ‗that the trial on the substantive offense will be followed by an habitual criminal proceeding‘‖
• holding that defendant’s federal constitutional due- process rights are not violated by post-guilt, pre-punishment-phase notice of the State’s intent to enhance punishment with a prior conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).