Pekin Insurance v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]llowing [the tow-truck operator policy] to become secondary coverage for its tow of the delivery van violates the public policy reflected in [the tow-truck statute].” (emphasis added)
• “[A]llowing [the tow-truck operator policy] to become secondary coverage for its tow of the delivery van violates the public policy reflected in [the tow- truck statute].” (emphasis added)
• “Absent an Illinois determination on a point of law, the courts of this state will look to other jurisdictions as persuasive authority.”
• where putative insured was not listed on the policy, “mere notice of the underlying cause of action alone did not necessarily put Pekin on notice that it owed a defense to its omnibus insured”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).