· 3/26/2008
Peitsch v. Keizer
Citations
- 180 P.3d 1239
- 219 Or. App. 114
- 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding a claim of instructional error unpre-served where the plaintiffs’ exception did not “cogently present for the trial court’s consideration the alleged deficiencies in that instruction that [the] plaintiffs urge[d] on appeal”
- rejecting as unpreserved a claim of instructional error because “the exception that [the] plaintiffs’ counsel did raise at that time did not cogently present for the trial court’s consideration the alleged deficiencies in that instruction that [the] plaintiffs urge on appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Rosenblum, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.