Skip to main content
· 3/26/2008

Peitsch v. Keizer

Citations

  • 180 P.3d 1239
  • 219 Or. App. 114
  • 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a claim of instructional error unpre-served where the plaintiffs’ exception did not “cogently present for the trial court’s consideration the alleged deficiencies in that instruction that [the] plaintiffs urge[d] on appeal”
  • rejecting as unpreserved a claim of instructional error because “the exception that [the] plaintiffs’ counsel did raise at that time did not cogently present for the trial court’s consideration the alleged deficiencies in that instruction that [the] plaintiffs urge on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Rosenblum, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.