Skip to main content
· 12/14/1967

Peirce v. Hoffstot

Citations

  • 211 Pa. Super. 380
  • 236 A.2d 828
  • 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding enforcement of rent acceleration clause, noting such clauses “have long been held valid”
  • “The tenant, then, does not forfeit [a]ll of his rights when the landlord accelerates, but must thereafter be accorded his possessory rights on payment of the accelerated rent.”
  • acceleration clause valid, but tenant must be afforded possessory rights
  • “The acceleration clause is ... a guarantee to the lessor that he will receive immediately all of the monies (or other compensation) to which he is entitled under the lease without having to harass a reluctant tenant as periodical payments become due.”
  • acceleration clause valid, but tenant must be afforded possessory rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Watkins, Montgomery, Jacobs, Hoffman, Spaulding

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.