Skip to main content
· 12/4/1962

Peine v. Murphy

Citations

  • 377 P.2d 708
  • 46 Haw. 233
  • 1962 Haw. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that party \who was induced to enter into the joint adventure agreement by fraudulent representations... may ... obtain a decree rescinding or cancelling the agreement ab initio \ (italicized font in original)
  • holding that party “who was induced to enter into the joint adventure agreement by fraudulent representations ... may ... obtain a decree rescinding or cancelling the agreement ab initio ” (italicized font in original)
  • holding that an agreement vitiated by fraud is void ab initio
  • fraudulent representation must have been relied upon, acted upon, and have constituted the basis upon which the transaction took place
  • \The [complaining] party must have relied and acted upon ... the fraudulent representations[.]\
  • “The [complaining] party must have relied and acted upon ... the fraudulent representations[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tsuklyama, Cassidy, Wirtz, Lewis, Mizuha

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.