· 12/4/1962
Peine v. Murphy
Citations
- 377 P.2d 708
- 46 Haw. 233
- 1962 Haw. LEXIS 97
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that party \who was induced to enter into the joint adventure agreement by fraudulent representations... may ... obtain a decree rescinding or cancelling the agreement ab initio \ (italicized font in original)
- holding that party “who was induced to enter into the joint adventure agreement by fraudulent representations ... may ... obtain a decree rescinding or cancelling the agreement ab initio ” (italicized font in original)
- holding that an agreement vitiated by fraud is void ab initio
- fraudulent representation must have been relied upon, acted upon, and have constituted the basis upon which the transaction took place
- \The [complaining] party must have relied and acted upon ... the fraudulent representations[.]\
- “The [complaining] party must have relied and acted upon ... the fraudulent representations[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tsuklyama, Cassidy, Wirtz, Lewis, Mizuha
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.