· 12/30/1986
Peifer v. Royal Bank
Citations
- 121 F.R.D. 39
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15911
- 1986 WL 20872
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a pro se plaintiff was “clearly culpable” because, inter alia, he failed to cooperate with discovery, attend a hearing, and ignored court orders
- pro se litigants prone to violate court rules due to lack of legal training
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nealon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.