Skip to main content
· 12/30/1986

Peifer v. Royal Bank

Citations

  • 121 F.R.D. 39
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15911
  • 1986 WL 20872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a pro se plaintiff was “clearly culpable” because, inter alia, he failed to cooperate with discovery, attend a hearing, and ignored court orders
  • pro se litigants prone to violate court rules due to lack of legal training

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nealon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.