Pehr v. Sunbeam Plastics Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was not sufficient evidence to find “that the potential costs and inconvenience to [the defendant] of litigating this matter in [the transferor state] so outweigh the corresponding costs and inconvenience to plaintiff of litigating the matter in Indiana”
• holding movant must employ evidence in meeting its burden
• “The court does not believe that Sunbeam’s conclusory allegations that more of the witnesses reside in Indiana, and that more of the documents necessary for trial are contained in Indiana, justify a transfer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).