Pegues v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that § 203 provides federal jurisdiction over actions to confirm or vacate an arbitral award governed by the Convention and separately assessing § 205 for removal jurisdiction
• finding removal under Section 205 proper and distinguishing cases whose resolutions would not require reading and examining an arbitration agreement that falls under the Convention
• “The handful of relevant decisions in this District have applied, without eBxepisleicritly adopting, the broad interpretation of § 205 articulateOdu tboyk uthmep uF iSfttha inClierscsu UitS iAn, LLC v. .”C
• “In order for an arbitration Agreement to fall under the Convention, it must meet four requirements: ‘(1) there must be a written agreement; (2) it must provide for arbitration in the territory of a signatory of the convention; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).