Peggy Ruth Davin v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where plaintiff failed to prove that she was replaced, she must establish that the misconduct for which she was discharged was nearly identical to that engaged in by another employee outside the protected class who was retained
• assuming, without deciding, that 45 U.S.C. § 152, Fourth implies “a private cause of action for reinstatement, back pay and damages in favor of any employee whose employment is terminated for engaging in concerted activity to improve conditions of employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).