Skip to main content
· 8/26/2015

Peggy Pendell v. City of Peoria, Illinois

Citations

  • 799 F.3d 916
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 15062
  • 2015 WL 5037943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the dismissal of a suit where the district judge purported to grant the defense motion under Rule 37 based on the plaintiff violating the order to appear for her deposition but dismissed the case for failure to prosecute
  • affirm- ing dismissal under Rule 37(d) after plaintiff repeatedly failed to appear for her deposition: “a court may dismiss a suit after the plaintiff has willfully refused to comply with discovery orders and the plaintiff has been warned that noncompliance may lead to dismissal”
  • affirming dismissal after two failures to appear at depositions
  • no right to effective counsel in civil cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: PerCuriam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.