Peggy Mayes v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 23 claimant must establish good cause for not seeking the medical examinations or opinions 24 at an earlier time
• holding that the ALJ had no duty to develop the record because the 15 record was “neither ambiguous nor inadequate”
• holding that “[a]n ALJ’s duty to develop the record further is triggered only when there is 23 ambiguous evidence or when the record is inadequate to allow for proper evaluation of the evidence”
• holding that “[a]n ALJ’s duty to develop the record further is triggered only when there is 19 ambiguous evidence or when the record is inadequate to allow for proper evaluation of the 20 evidence”
• holding that an “ALJ’s duty to develop the 2 record further is triggered only when there is ambiguous evidence or when the record is inadequate 3 to allow for proper evaluation of the evidence”
• holding that “[a]n ALJ’s duty to develop the 9 record further is triggered only when there is ambiguous evidence or when the record is 10 inadequate to allow for proper evaluation of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).