Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of Virginia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court may consider stock purchase agreement, offering memorandum, and warrant, on a motion to dismiss, even when these materials were not attached to complaint
• holding that consideration of insurance policies attached to defendant’s motion to dismiss “did not require conversion” of the motion “into a motion for summary judgment” because the policies were “referred to throughout the complaint”
• holding that an insurer’s attachment of life insurance policies to its 12(b)(6
• holding that “a document not formally incorporated by reference or attached to a complaint may still be considered part of the pleadings” if the document “is referred to in the complaint and is central to the plaintiff’s claim”
• holding that insurer's attachment of life-insurance policies to its 12(b)(6) motion did not require court to convert to a motion for summary judgment where policies were referred to throughout complaint and were central to insureds' fraud claim arising from purchase of policies
• finding that documents attached to a motion to dismiss that are referred to in the complaint and central to the claim are deemed to form a part of the pleadings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).