Pegasus Satellite Television, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying Pegasus’s motion for 15 reconsideration on grounds of “improper appli[cation] [of] Ninth Circuit” opinion 16 because “a motion for reconsideration may not be made on the grounds that a party 17 disagrees with the Court’s application of legal precedent.”
• “Under L.R. 7-18, a motion for reconsideration may not be made on the grounds that a party disagrees with the Court’s application of legal precedent.”
• “Pegasus is not a third-party beneficiary to the DBS Agreement. Since Pegasus has not presented any other basis which would confer it standing to assert these claims, the prudential doctrine of standing precludes Pegasus’ declaratory relief claims against DirecTV.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).