Pegasus Holdings v. Veterinary Centers of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claims against non-speaking defendants where plaintiffs failed “to address how the non-speaking individuals were involved in the scheme, and the acts each performed (or omitted) which further the conspiracy”
• where an action involves multiple defendants, a plaintiff “must 9 provide each and every defendant with enough information to enable them to know what 10 misrepresentations are attributable to them and what fraudulent conduct they are charged 11 with.”
• where an action involves multiple defendants, a plaintiff “must 25 provide each and every defendant with enough information to enable them to know what 26 misrepresentations are attributable to them and what fraudulent conduct they are charged 27 with.”
• where an action involves multiple defendants, a plaintiff “must provide 27 each and every defendant with enough information to enable them to know what 28 1 misrepresentations are attributable to them and what fraudulent conduct they are charged 2 with.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).