Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/21/1995
Peery v. Hanley
Citations
- 897 P.2d 1189
- 135 Or. App. 162
- 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 944
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiffs testimony, if believed, is sufficient to establish causation element of emotional distress claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riggs, Landau, Leeson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. WillbanksTennessee Supreme Court· 1999-11-15· cited 106×
- Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 10×
- Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 7×
- Pinkerton v. Tri-County Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-28· cited 4×
- Peery v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-06· cited 1×
- William Searle v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-10-06
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 102×
- Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court· 1971-05-26· cited 88×
- Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. WadeOregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-19· cited 39×
- Scholes v. Sipco Services & Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-10-03· cited 18×
Other cases named Peery v. Hanley
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.