· 2/28/1990
Peerless Dyeing Co. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
Citations
- 573 A.2d 541
- 392 Pa. Super. 434
- 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘When a word or phrase is specifically defined within the policy, that definition controls in determining the applicability of the policy.”
- “it is the duty of the court to interpret an unambiguous [insurance policy] provision while interpretation of ambiguous clauses may properly be left to a jury”
- \it is the duty of the court to interpret an unambiguous [insurance policy] provision while interpretation of ambiguous clauses may properly be left to a jury\
- “When a word or phrase is specifically defined within the policy, that definition controls in determining the applicability of the policy.”
- “The law of Pennsylvania requires that an insurance policy be construed in accordance with its plain, common, and ordinary meaning.”
- \it is the duty of the court to interpret an unambiguous [insurance policy] provision while interpretation of ambiguous clauses may properly be left to a jury\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Olszewski, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.