Peebles v. Minnis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• entirety property that, under statute, was not “liable to be taken on execution” was nevertheless subject to attachment, so as to “protect[] the creditor’s interest in the property as against the debtor’s other creditors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coraccio v. Lowell Five Cents Savings Bank
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-05-05· cited 55×
• Snyder v. Rockland Trust Co. (In Re Snyder)
  First Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 26×
• In Re Robbins
  D. Massachusetts· 1995-09-22· cited 15×
• Bakwin v. Mardirosian
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-04-02· cited 15×
• In Re Snyder
  D. Massachusetts· 1999-03-18· cited 13×
• In Re McConchie
  D. Massachusetts· 1988-12-14· cited 10×
• Levy v. Crawford
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-10-07· cited 6×
• In re Smither
  D. Massachusetts· 2015-11-30· cited 6×
• In Re Digaudio
  D. Massachusetts· 1991-06-03· cited 5×
• Lewis v. Maloon (In Re Lewis)
  D. Massachusetts· 1988-11-18· cited 5×
• In re Yotis
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-09-26· cited 4×
• Hull v. North Adams Hoosac Savings Bank (In Re Hull)
  D. Massachusetts· 1994-06-30· cited 1×
• Desmond v. Chiang (In re Chiang)
  D. Massachusetts· 2016-12-21· cited 1×
• Mediplex of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Donovan
  Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.· 1994-06-21· cited 1×
• United States v. Goodwin
  District of Columbia· 2018-09-21
• United States Trust Co. v. Einreinhofer
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 1994-07-25
• Richey v. Sullivan
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 1997-05-14
• Michael Shea Co. v. Sheehan
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2006-05-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Marcus v. Pearce Woolen Mills, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1968-01-04· cited 11×