Skip to main content
· 12/12/2005

Peebles v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fener & Smith Inc.

Citations

  • 431 F.3d 1320
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27069
  • 2005 WL 3357496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Federal Arbitration Act does not confer subject matter jurisdiction ... nor does it create independent federal question jurisdiction. Independent grounds for subject matter jurisdiction must be demonstrated.”
  • “The [FAA] does not confer subject matter jurisdiction . . . nor does it create independent federal question jurisdiction. . . Independent grounds for subject matter jurisdiction must be demonstrated.”
  • “We hold that a federal court has subject matter jurisdiction where a party seeking to vacate an arbitration award is also seeking a new arbitration hearing at which he will demand a sum which exceeds the amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Barkett, Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.