Skip to main content
· 12/5/2007

Pee Dee Health Care, P.A. v. Sanford

Citations

  • 509 F.3d 204
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28027
  • 2007 WL 4247327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that healthcare providers rights to sue under § 1983 related to the Medicaid program can be limited by contract
  • following Wilder and allowing use of section 1983 to enforce another Medicaid payment requirement under fee-for-service model
  • following Wilder and allowing use of section 1983 to enforce another Medicaid payment requirement under fee-for-service model
  • following Wilder and allowing use of section 1983 to enforce another Medicaid payment requirement under fee-for-service model
  • following Wilder and allowing use of section 1983 to enforce another Medicaid payment requirement under fee-for-service model
  • “The Medicaid Act . . 6 . allows for two methods of reimbursement. The first method is a ‘prospective 7 payment system’ based on historical‐average costs plus a cost‐of‐living factor. 42 8 U.S.C. § 1396a(bb)(2). The second method, set forth in § 1396a(bb)(6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael, Gregory, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.