Skip to main content
· 3/5/2010

Pedro v. Huggins

Citations

  • 53 V.I. 98
  • 2010 V.I. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s application of Habeas Rule 4 to dismiss a Section 2241 petition
  • affirming district court’s 27 application of Habeas Rule 4 to dismiss Section 2241 petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.