Pedro Diaz v. Multi Service Technology Solutions Corporation, a Missouri Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “shorthand reference” to a standing order or other written document can be “adoption all the same”
• explaining that a “sentencing court pronounces supervision conditions when it orally adopts a document recommending those conditions”
• observing defendant “could have objected before the hearing, when the court asked if he had any objections to the PSR, when the court adopted the PSR, or when the court pronounced the supervisory conditions”
• practice of adopting written list of proposed conditions “works to the defendant’s benefit because it affords earlier notice than when a defendant hears conditions for the first time when the judge announces them” (quotation omitted)
• “If [the defendant] had th[e] chance [to object before the district court] but failed to do so, we review for plain error. If he did not have the opportunity, we review for abuse of discretion.” (internal citations and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).