Pedro Cuadra v. James E. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where petitioners are pro se, “the district court ‘should review habeas petitions with a lenient eye, allowing borderline cases to proceed,’ ” quoting Williams v. Kullman, 722 F.2d 1048, 1050 (2d Cir. 1983)
• “[W]e have ruled that summary dismissal of a habeas petition prior to requiring a response is appropriate only where the petition indicates ‘that petitioner can prove no set of facts to support a claim entitling him to relief.’” (quoting Williams, 722 F.2d at 1050 (2d Cir. 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).