Pedinol Pharmacal, Inc. v. Rising Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a plaintiff is not “automatically entitled to all of defendant’s profits over the time period” of the false statements
• discussing whether defendants were “well aware” and “directly responsible” for the infringing acts
• “First and most importantly, when Section 1117 was amended to provide for recovery of a defendant’s profits for a willful violation under Section 1125(c), no changes were made regarding the recovery provisions of Section 1125(a) or (d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).