Pederson v. Gould

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court did not err in failing to charge the jury as to the common knowledge exception
• finding damage to the ureter during a hysterectomy did not fall in common knowledge exception
• in medical malpractice actions, plaintiff must use expert testimony to establish both required standard of care and doctor’s failure to conform to that standard
• a vaginal hysterectomy found to be a significant surgical procedure and not proper for the common knowledge exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).