Peden v. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parol evidence is admissible to resolve a contractual term that is ambiguous
• “[T]he closing date of each previous Phase can vary by as much as nearly a year depending on how many extension options are exercised, and whether Horton elects its option under Section 6 to pursue the Approvals itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).