Peden v. American Bridge Co.
Citations
- 120 F. 523
- 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5288
Syllabus
<p>1. Death — Declaration—Allegation of Damages.</p> <p>Where, in an action for death by decedent’s administrator, the declaration alleged that decedent left, him surviving, his widow and four children, and contained the usual allegation of damages to plaintiff as administrator, it was not objectionable for failure to allege damages sustained by the next of kin; damages to the wife and children being presumed.</p> <p>2. Same — Defects Available after Verdict.</p> <p>Under Rev. St. Ill. c. 7, § 6, par. 9, providing that judgment shall not be arrested after verdict by reason of want of any allegation or aver ment on account of which omission a special demurrer could have been sustained, where no demurrer was interposed to a declaration for wrongful death, and the jury, found that decedent’s next of kin had sustained substantial damages by reason of defendant’s negligence, a judgment on the verdict could not be arrested on the ground that the declaration did not allege damage to the next of kin.</p> <p>¶ 1. See Death, vol. 15, Cent. Dig. § 69.</p>
Judges: Kohlsaat
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court· 1861-04-15· cited 57×
- Korrady v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court· 1892-01-16· cited 43×
- Haug v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-04-28· cited 24×
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. BrodieIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-05-15· cited 20×
- McKechney v. RedmondAppellate Court of Illinois· 1901-04-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.