Skip to main content
· 6/20/2002

Peda v. American Home Products Corp.

Citations

  • 214 F. Supp. 2d 1007
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11070
  • 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 428
  • 2002 WL 1670706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs argument that the defendant “caused Plaintiffs inability to return to work” cannot “hold water” because the so-called causation was insufficient to “rise to the level of actionable harassment”
  • holding that defendant’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss individual defendants is denied as moot because summary judgment was granted for corporate defendants in sex discrimination claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.