Peck & Walton v. Gale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff “has stated Bivens claims against the six CBP officers for use of excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
• “[A] pro se litigant cannot simply 28 dump a stack of exhibits on the court and expect the court to sift through them to determine if 1 some nugget is buried somewhere in that mountain of papers, waiting to be unearthed and refined 2 into a cognizable claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).