Peck v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the California Supreme Court has allowed independent claims for unjust enrichment to proceed
• holding the district court erred when it dismissed plaintiff’s unjust 9 enrichment claim, and acknowledging California law allowed an independent claim for 10 unjust enrichment to proceed
• finding that 25 because competitors’ labels “make many of the same illegal claims . . . [a] reasonable jury 26 comparing the labels side by side could not rationally conclude [defendant’s] labels were 27 likely to deceive”
• recognizing unjust 22 enrichment as an independent claim under California law
• reversing district court’s 10 || dismissal of unjust enrichment claim following California Supreme Court decision 11 || permitting unjust enrichment as an independent claim
• reversing a dismissal based on unjust enrichment not being a standalone cause of action, for an insurance dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).