Peck v. Rooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the court may use extrinsic documents for the purposes of interpreting ambiguous contract terms but stating that “[i]nternal agency documents ... of course, do not by themselves establish legally-enforeeable rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).