Skip to main content
· 5/24/1897

Peck v. Heurich

Citations

  • 167 U.S. 624
  • 17 S. Ct. 927
  • 42 L. Ed. 302
  • 1897 U.S. LEXIS 2119

Syllabus

<p>A judgment cannot be affirmed upon a ground not taken at the trial, unless it is made clear beyond doubt that this could not prejudice the rights of the plaintiff in error.</p> <p>By the common law, prevailing in the District of Columbia, an agreement by an attorney at law to prosecute, at his own expense, a suit to recover land in which he personally has and claims no title or interest, present or contingent; in consideration of receiving a certain proportion of what he may recover, is unlawful and void for champerty.</p> <p>A deed, conveying lands in the District of Columbia to an attorney at law and another person, in trust that the grantees should sue for, take possession of, and sell the lands, and that the attorney should retain one third of the proceeds, after paying out of it all the costs and expenditures, and that the other two thirds, clear of any costs or charges whatever, should be paid to the grantors, is void for champerty, and will pot sustain an action by the grantees to recover part of the lands from third persons.</p>

Judges: Gray, After Stating the Case

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.