Skip to main content
· 8/24/1846

Peck v. Elder

Citations

  • 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 38
  • 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiffs defamation claim should have been dismissed, since “[t]he termination letter containing the phrase ‘severe dereliction of duty’ was not published to anyone other than the plaintiff himself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.