Peck v. Aetna Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plan’s sole reliance on the DOT and failure “to contradict, or even acknowledge, [the plaintiffs] evidence that she could not perform the material duties of her own occupation” was arbitrary and capricious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).