Peck Daniel Auto Sales, Inc. v. Coahoma Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where a party only challenges certain conclusions of law, the appellate court \consider[s] any challenge to the other conclusions abandoned[.]\ (citing N.C.R. App. P. 28(a) ); Hartman v. Robertson , 208 N.C. App. 692 , 694, 703 S.E.2d 811 , 813 (2010
• “It is well established that officers with proper training and experience may opine that a substance is marijuana.”
• “[M]ost significantly, Trooper Hicks felt a blunt object in defendant’s crotch area during the pat-down, directly implicating defendant’s undergarments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).