Peaster v. David New Drilling Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming judgment in favor of employer without allowing plaintiff to develop and present more evidence that injury was result of intentional tort and outside scope of workers' compensation
• finding allegations raised in Complaint amounted to negligence, thus leading to approval of the dismissal of those claims under “the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act”
• affirming judgment in favor of employer without allowing plaintiff to develop and present more evidence that injury was a result of intentional tort and outside scope of workers' compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).