Skip to main content
· 10/15/1842

Pease v. Bancroft

Citations

  • 46 Mass. 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a lower court erred, post-remand, when it failed to hold an evidentiary hearing to consider new disputed factual allegations that “would have directly pertained” to the issue at hand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.